(no subject)
Apr. 23rd, 2009 07:34 pmI'm not cross-posting this, because it's Dreamwidth-specific stuff.
1. I made a community! Probably a very low traffic one, but I felt Dreamwidth needed a Danielewski community, therefore:
navidsonrecord.
2. I love that the maximum username length has been extended to... is it twenty-five characters, I think? This opens up so many possibilities for community and user names. (I did consider going with
wehauefoundftaires for the above, but...)
3. I have no idea yet what my "circle policy" is going to be. I've subscribed to a whole load of people who look interesting, but haven't put anyone on my "access list" except friends I've known for quite a while via other sites. I suppose since I don't plan to make a lot of locked posts at all, it doesn't make a huge difference; I might very well just stick everyone onto my "access list", so I can occasionally lock posts down that contain personal information but people can still read them. Or perhaps I'll just wait until the "hm, do I want to lock this?" issue actually arises. I don't know. This is a whole new interesting social-networking dilemma, hm. :) What are other people doing about this?
1. I made a community! Probably a very low traffic one, but I felt Dreamwidth needed a Danielewski community, therefore:
2. I love that the maximum username length has been extended to... is it twenty-five characters, I think? This opens up so many possibilities for community and user names. (I did consider going with
3. I have no idea yet what my "circle policy" is going to be. I've subscribed to a whole load of people who look interesting, but haven't put anyone on my "access list" except friends I've known for quite a while via other sites. I suppose since I don't plan to make a lot of locked posts at all, it doesn't make a huge difference; I might very well just stick everyone onto my "access list", so I can occasionally lock posts down that contain personal information but people can still read them. Or perhaps I'll just wait until the "hm, do I want to lock this?" issue actually arises. I don't know. This is a whole new interesting social-networking dilemma, hm. :) What are other people doing about this?
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-23 10:06 pm (UTC)One effect of the subscribe/access set-up here is that I'll probably subscribe to people for a while before I give them access. This is the sort of thing I might have done more of at LJ, but setting up filters and adjusting them as you add new people is a pain.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-24 04:36 am (UTC)(Possibly it may be silly to stick with my LJ strategy when Dreamwidth has gone out of its way to engineer things so that you can subscribe without giving access, but I am a habitty, habit-bound creature of habit.)
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-25 07:44 pm (UTC)I'm thinking that I'll have people I consider friends on my access list, but just subscribe to people that I want to watch, but don't consider myself that close to. I have a tendency of locking most things, anyway, for various reasons, heh. :3